If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join Navipedia as a registered user

Carrier Phase Wind-up Effect

From Navipedia
Jump to: navigation, search


FundamentalsFundamentals
Title Carrier Phase Wind-up Effect
Author(s) J. Sanz Subirana, J.M. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernández-Pajares, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain.
Level Advanced
Year of Publication 2011

Wind-up affects only to the carrier phase measurements, but not the code pseudoranges. It is due to the electromagnetic nature of circularly polarised waves, intrinsic of the GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo...) signals. This correction is only required for high accuracy positioning (e.g., PPP).

The Wind-up effect on phase measurements depends on the relative orientation of satellite and receiver antennas, and the direction of the line of sight [footnotes 1].

For a receiver with fixed coordinates, the wind-up is due to the satellite orbital motion. As the satellite moves along its orbital path it must perform a rotation to keep its solar panels pointing to the sun direction in order to obtain the maximum energy while the satellite antenna keeps pointing to the earth's centre. This rotation causes a phase variation that the receiver misunderstands as a range variation.

The wind-up correction () due to the satellite motion can be computed from the expressions derived by [Wu et al., 1993][1] for a crossed dipole antenna:

where is the fractional part of a cycle given by
with
and N is an integer number given by
(N can be initialised as zero)
where is the previous value of phase correction, stands for the nearest integer and and are two effective dipole for the receiver and transmitter


where the unitary vectors , , , and are defined as follows:
Figure 1: Layout of dipole orientation to compute the wind-up.


Continuity between consecutive phase observations must be ensured by adding full cycle terms of to the correction (1).


  • Receiver coordinate system: , : The local Earth North Up (ENU) coordinates can be used for the receiver, and the unitary orthogonal vectors and be defined as pointing to the East and North.


  • Satellite coordinate system: , : The satellite-fixed-coordinate frame of the Satellite Antenna Phase Centre can be used for the satellite, and the unitary orthogonal vectors and be defined as pointing to the and directions, defined by equations



being


[footnotes 2]


  • Line of sight vector : is a unitary vector pointing from satellite to receiver.


Due to the carrier phase ambiguity, the value can be chosen arbitrarily at the beginning of phase tracking session, and usually it is taken as zero (i.e., it is assimilated into the unknown carrier phase ambiguity).


Figure 2 illustrates the effect of the carrier wind-up correction. The solution computed using the wind-up correction is shown in blue and the solution without using this correction in red. The wind-up effect on range is shown in the second row at left.


Figure 2: Carrier phase Wind-up: Range and position domain effect
Wind Up Effect Ex2e2.png
Wind Up Effect Ex2e3.png
Wind Up Effect Ex2e1.png
First row shows the horizontal (left) and vertical (right) positioning error using (blue) or not using (red) the carrier wind-up correction, equation (1). The wind-up effect on range is shown in the second row at left


Notes

  1. ^ Imagine that the satellite-to-receiver distance keeps fixed, but the satellite turns around , the distance measured over phase would vary a wavelength, that would be approximately centimetres for the GPS carrier phase measurement
  2. ^ The planetary ephemeris are usually given in the CRS reference frame (i.e, relative to the Aries direction. Nevertheless, given the low accuracy required for these computations (only to compute the unitary vectors), a simple rotation of sidereal time is enough to transform the CRS coordinates to the TRS (see Reference Frames in GNSS).


References

  1. ^ [Wu et al., 1993] Wu, J., Wu, S., Hajj, G., Bertiguer, W. and Lichten, S., 1993. Effects of Antenna Orientation on GPS Carrier Phase Measurements. Manuscripta Geodaetica. 18, pp. 91-98.