If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join Navipedia as a registered user

GNSS Measurement features and noise

From Navipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Title GNSS Measurement features and noise
Author(s) J. Sanz Subirana, J.M. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernández-Pajares, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain.
Level Advanced
Year of Publication 2011

In this article we are going to present the main features of the GNSS receiver measurements, the noise measurement, and how it affects the combinations.

Two main features of code and carrier phase measurements nature are depicted in figure 1: While code measurements (in green) show a noisy but continuous pattern, the carrier phase track (in blue) is thinner but broken by sudden jumps. The magnitude of such jumps is always unknown, and they happen every time the receiver recovers the carrier phase lock after a signal lose. This behaviour can be summarised in the following two concepts:

  • Code measurements are noisy but unambiguous.
  • Carrier measurements are precise but ambiguous.

The previous example allows introducing the distinction between two different concepts, often used as synonyms: Precision and Accuracy.

Precision refers to the dispersion of a measurement around a mean value (not necessarily the true one). Accuracy refers to the closeness of the measurement to the true value. In this way, notice that a measurement like the carrier phase can be highly precise, i.e., very low noise level, but extremely wrong due to the unknown bias, which can reach thousands of kilometres (in the figure the carrier phase has been shifted to fit into the plot frame).

Figure 1:GPS code and carrier phase measurement features. The geometry-free combinations of code (), in green, and carrier (), in blue, are plotted as function of time for a given satellite.

The code and carrier phase measurement noise depends on different factors like the signal power, the method used for the analog-to-digital conversion, the correlation process, the design of the antenna, etc. These errors are independent for each receiver and for each signal, and can not be removed by differential techniques (differences between receivers or satellites) or by combinations of measurements.

Figure 2 shows a comparison of code pseudorange noise for the original GPS P1 and P2 code raw measurements and their combinations.The data was collected on December 16th 2008, in Barcelona, Spain, with an Ashtec Z-XII receiver and an AT2775-42W antenna.

In the plots of the figure 2, the geometry and dispersive delays have been removed by a combination of carriers (indicated within the brackets at the top of each plot) in order to allow a better visualisation of the code measurement noise. The approximate expression of -noise for each combination (see article Combination of GNSS Measurements), assuming uncorrelated signal noise [footnotes 1], is also given under each plot. Notice the agreement between the noise shown in the different plots and the theoretical values derived from this simple approach, assuming the same noise in both frequencies.

Figure 2: Comparison of code pseudorange noise for the original GPS and raw code measurements and their main combinations (see captions) The geometry and the dispersive delays have been removed by a combination of carrier phases [indicated within the brackets]. The approximate expression of -noise is given above each plot. Note: , , and
GNSS Meas feat & noise Fig 2.png
GNSS Meas feat & noise Fig 3.png
GNSS Meas feat & noise Fig 4.png

The two main sources of receiver measurement error are presented below: Receiver noise and Multipath. For more information, please go to the following articles:


  1. ^ The expressions are based in the following results: Given two independent random variables , , and two constants , , then, .